Difference between revisions of "Remote Sensing"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Remote Sensing''' is a generic term for types of satellite or high-altitude aviation imagery that contains bands outside of the visual spectrum, or uses a novel method of capturing images that the human eye would otherwise be unable to see.<blockquote>"Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see" - Sam Neill, ''Event Horizon''</blockquote> |
'''Remote Sensing''' is a generic term for types of satellite or high-altitude aviation imagery that contains bands outside of the visual spectrum, or uses a novel method of capturing images that the human eye would otherwise be unable to see.<blockquote>"Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see" - Sam Neill, ''Event Horizon''</blockquote> |
||
| + | == Sources== |
||
| − | == How to get remote sensing data== |
||
As with most imagery, remote sensing data tends to fall into one of two categories: freely available and low resolution (to a technical user), or high quality and easy to use but ''absurdly'' expensive. If you have to ask ''how'' expensive, odds are you simply don't have the money.<ref>https://twitter.com/mouthofmorrison/status/1542290102696779778?s=20&t=z_hrdE0D7p42UFnGJHAJ0Q</ref> This is all to assume that you can even ''open'' the data and use it- the software to do so is either proprietary, clunky, or both.<sup>[''Citation NOT needed'' ''but provided anyways'']</sup><ref>https://twitter.com/mouthofmorrison/status/1547171655897726979?s=20&t=z_hrdE0D7p42UFnGJHAJ0Q</ref> |
As with most imagery, remote sensing data tends to fall into one of two categories: freely available and low resolution (to a technical user), or high quality and easy to use but ''absurdly'' expensive. If you have to ask ''how'' expensive, odds are you simply don't have the money.<ref>https://twitter.com/mouthofmorrison/status/1542290102696779778?s=20&t=z_hrdE0D7p42UFnGJHAJ0Q</ref> This is all to assume that you can even ''open'' the data and use it- the software to do so is either proprietary, clunky, or both.<sup>[''Citation NOT needed'' ''but provided anyways'']</sup><ref>https://twitter.com/mouthofmorrison/status/1547171655897726979?s=20&t=z_hrdE0D7p42UFnGJHAJ0Q</ref> |
||
Revision as of 07:28, 16 July 2022
Remote Sensing is a generic term for types of satellite or high-altitude aviation imagery that contains bands outside of the visual spectrum, or uses a novel method of capturing images that the human eye would otherwise be unable to see.
"Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see" - Sam Neill, Event Horizon
Sources
As with most imagery, remote sensing data tends to fall into one of two categories: freely available and low resolution (to a technical user), or high quality and easy to use but absurdly expensive. If you have to ask how expensive, odds are you simply don't have the money.[1] This is all to assume that you can even open the data and use it- the software to do so is either proprietary, clunky, or both.[Citation NOT needed but provided anyways][2]
However, as time goes on, more and more is slowly becoming available.[3] (Todo: if anyone can figure out the prices for various providers, here would be a good place to put them)
Free remote sensing data sources
- NASA (EarthExplorer, various)
- ESA (Sentinel-1)
Paid remote sensing data sources
- Capella (SAR)
- Hawkeye 360
- ICEYE
Types
NIR (Near-Infrared)
Many satellite imagery providers (e.g. Planet 0.5m) include NIR bands. NIR puts particular emphasis on plants and vegetation, and can be used with other bands to detect regions of ice, vegetation, fires, etc. A common method of analysis is to simply use the imagery as you would optical, but replace the "red" band (e.g. in Qgis) with the NIR data.
SAR
todo
Other
todo: talk about how you can detect ice, snow, fire, etc. by doing veeery specific band math in e.g. qgis. Maybe write a guide on it?